The cognitive pedagogical perspective sees learning as a result of thoughts, experiences, and sensations—learning through understanding.
What Does That Mean?
In practice this means knowledge is transmitted by communication, explanation, recombination, contrast, inference, and problem solving. In e-learning, this is often applied through ‘cognitive scaffolding’--a kind of guide that is always present and supports the learner by asking questions and promoting reflection.
Kolb’s Learning Cycle
This is likely the best known experiential pedagogical model, from the work of David Kolb. It takes a ‘learn by doing’ approach that passes through four repeating stages:
Laurillard’s Conversational Framework
Diana Laurillard’s framework (an interactive visual can be found here) outlines the process of interaction between a teacher and student and shows how learning concepts are handled and adapted as they interact back and forth.
Community of Inquiry Framework
This approach focuses on collaborative problem-based learning and consists of three overlapping parts:
Constructivist Learning Environments
This type of framework assumes learning happens when students are engaged in building meaning in an activity. There are five parts:
n-Quire Framework
This personal inquiry framework supports learning in different contexts. The inquiry process is represented as a series of connected, iterative phases from the viewpoint of the learner:
To apply cognitive pedagogical models in an e-learning environment, intelligent learning systems and adaptive learning technology can be used to adapt content to the learner’s progress; simulated worlds and other structured learning environments can help immerse the learner in content; support systems can guide and prompt learners;and social or other collaborative tools can be used to promote dialogue, interaction, and vicarious learning.
In the next post, we’ll look at situative models and frameworks of e-learning pedagogy.
Based on Gráinne Conole’s Review of pedagogical models and their use in e-learning.